Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:28

What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Most companies are already raising prices or plan to because of tariffs, data shows - CNBC
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Is It Finally a Buyer’s Market in Housing? - A Wealth of Common Sense
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Diablo II: Resurrected Ladder Season 11 Now Live - Blizzard News
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Amgen Shares Fall on Weight-Loss Drug Tummy Troubles - Barron's
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What was something you did naughty with your cousin?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.